I know a lot of people like this card ironically, but I think it’s a great way to start the list and have another metric to go by. On the opposite side of the spectrum, the card in the #1 spot is the absolute worst card of them all. In terms of how the rankings are organized, the card in the 30th place slot is designated as the “best” worst card, meaning that it’s the most playable. A 2-mana 2/2 is still good in Limited, and it wouldn’t be broken in Unlimited either. It wouldn’t be fair to judge a lot of the cards from Magic’s first few sets to something from All Will Be One. The reason I’ve picked Grizzly Bears is that it falls in the middle ground between some of the first creatures and the most recent ones.
We want to look at each card individually. That means that I’m not going to take into account the possible infinite combos or insane synergies cards may have with other, specific cards in the game. Anything included is obviously going to be worse to have than the Bears in a general, isolated setting.
Grizzly Bears will act as my baseline for this list. It’s important to have some kind of scale or metric to judge cards, so I’d like to direct your attention to Grizzly Bears, a 2/2 for two mana. Lots of cards are just generally bad for the amount of mana you’re paying, while others are just (seemingly) entirely downside. Cleland-Huraĭetermining whether a card is “bad” or not can be tricky.
0 kommentar(er)
