Opinions online concerning Force are mixed. This made it popular in the outboard market.
It had been made as simple as possible to allow for ease of repair and fewer parts to break down in the first place.īecause of the simple design with fewer moving parts than other brands, it was more affordable to a casual boater. A Solid Design:īefore the advent of newer fuels, the Force Outboard motor was a solid and durable design, carried over from the Chrysler designs and construction. It must be pointed out how odd it is that the engineers responsible for both Mercury and Force only updated the designs of Mercury outboards, letting Force continue on an unsustainable path, both functionally and environmentally.
Force did not change to meet these new regulations. In addition, new environmental regulations were passed that mandated cleaner operation from all motors, which affected the outboard market in particular, as emissions went right into the water.
#FORCE ENGINE REVIEWS UPGRADE#
This failure to upgrade to newer fuels is one of the primary reasons that Force had to close their doors. The detonations in these cross-scavenged combustion chambers were uneven in this design, leading to piston damage and thermal runway cylinder damage.Īll other engine manufacturers, including Mercury motors made in the same plant, went to loop scavenged combustion chambers and flat-topped pistons, which were necessary for proper detonation.įorce Outboards, for whatever reason, did not change their designs of pistons or detonation chambers, which caused damage from the newer, unstable fuels. The specific problem here is the design of the combustion chambers and the ridged pistons that Chrysler and later Force employed. They are susceptible to evaporation and separation. These low-lead fuels break down quicker in storage, particularly when mixed with oil. Modern gasoline has an inherent instability compared to gas before 1990. This philosophy continued through the introduction of newer fuels in the early 1990s, when the problems with Force’s designs began. The Chrysler Outboards had been designed to be simple, allowing for ease of repair and acquiring replacement parts. Originally, Force Outboards were very durable. Mercury motors were redesigned to meet the newer fuels and standards, but curiously Force Outboards did not receive any of these improvements that they needed to function properly.īecause of this refusal to upgrade the Force designs, sales completely fell off, and in 1999 the Force brand was discontinued. With all of these changing factors affecting Force, sales fell off rapidly. In addition, new environmental regulations went into effect that changed the acceptable level of emissions from outboards. However, the modern fuels of the 1990s gave these engine designs problems, and word began to spread of engine failures in Force Outboard motors. Brunswick also owned the Mercury Outboard motor brand.įorce engines were popular, like Chrysler was before, because of their simple designs and low cost. In 1986, Force and its parent company of Bayliner were acquired by the Brunswick Corporation. The early models were essentially the same as the last models of Chrysler Outboards. Though the outboard division of Chrysler had been profitable, it was bought in 1983 by US Marine, part of the Bayliner brand. In the early 1980s, Chrysler Corporation was forced to sell off their non-core businesses to receive bailout funds from the United States government. Which Brands Produce Engines Similar to Force?.
How Is the Warranty On Force Outboards?.Where Are Outboard Force Engines Manufactured?.
What Are the Most Popular Force Outboards?.How Long Do Force Outboard Engines Typically Last?.A Brief History Of Force Outboard Motors.Here’s How Good Force Outboard Motors are:.
0 kommentar(er)
